<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Badge of Honor?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html</link>
	<description>Data is ones and zeroes &#124; Software is ones and zeroes and hard work.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:23:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Notebook Science Badges &#171; Software Carpentry</title>
		<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html#comment-1947</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Notebook Science Badges &#171; Software Carpentry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html#comment-1947</guid>
		<description>[...] Notebook Science&#160;Badges  I blogged last summer about creating a badging scheme for open science. Turns out it&#8217;s been done: ONS Claims has badges for four flavors of open [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Notebook Science&nbsp;Badges  I blogged last summer about creating a badging scheme for open science. Turns out it&#8217;s been done: ONS Claims has badges for four flavors of open [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SciFoo, eGY, and Splitting &#171; Software Carpentry</title>
		<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html#comment-1946</link>
		<dc:creator>SciFoo, eGY, and Splitting &#171; Software Carpentry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 01:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html#comment-1946</guid>
		<description>[...] but think that something like the Open Source Initiative&#8217;s &#8220;certified open&#8221; badge would be more useful than UN-ish statements like, &#8220;Effort should be made to identify and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but think that something like the Open Source Initiative&#8217;s &#8220;certified open&#8221; badge would be more useful than UN-ish statements like, &#8220;Effort should be made to identify and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Badge of Reproducibility &#171; Software Carpentry</title>
		<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html#comment-1945</link>
		<dc:creator>Badge of Reproducibility &#171; Software Carpentry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html#comment-1945</guid>
		<description>[...] of&#160;Reproducibility  Coming back to the badge meme from earlier this week, John Cook&#8217;s new Reproducible Research blog pointed me at this page on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of&nbsp;Reproducibility  Coming back to the badge meme from earlier this week, John Cook&#8217;s new Reproducible Research blog pointed me at this page on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Third Bit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Open Notebook Science Badges</title>
		<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html#comment-1944</link>
		<dc:creator>The Third Bit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Open Notebook Science Badges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html#comment-1944</guid>
		<description>[...] blogged last summer about creating a badging scheme for open science. Turns out it&#8217;s been done: ONS Claims has badges for four flavors of open [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogged last summer about creating a badging scheme for open science. Turns out it&#8217;s been done: ONS Claims has badges for four flavors of open [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Third Bit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SciFoo, eGY, and Splitting</title>
		<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html#comment-1943</link>
		<dc:creator>The Third Bit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SciFoo, eGY, and Splitting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html#comment-1943</guid>
		<description>[...] but think that something like the Open Source Initiative&#8217;s &#8220;certified open&#8221; badge would be more useful than UN-ish statements like, &#8220;Effort should be made to identify and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but think that something like the Open Source Initiative&#8217;s &#8220;certified open&#8221; badge would be more useful than UN-ish statements like, &#8220;Effort should be made to identify and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Third Bit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Badge of Reproducibility</title>
		<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html#comment-1942</link>
		<dc:creator>The Third Bit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Badge of Reproducibility</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html#comment-1942</guid>
		<description>[...] back to the badge meme from earlier this week, John Cook&#8217;s new Reproducible Research blog pointed me at this page on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] back to the badge meme from earlier this week, John Cook&#8217;s new Reproducible Research blog pointed me at this page on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html#comment-1941</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html#comment-1941</guid>
		<description>This sounds like a good idea, but I suppose one needs a clear definition of that the badge means/entails. In the case of the various software licenses, or creative commons licenses, that is straightforward -- what is being licensed is clear, as well as the terms of the license.

What is being distributed in open science? Is it just the text describing a particular piece of work? If that is the case, don&#039;t the creative commons licenses/badges apply?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like a good idea, but I suppose one needs a clear definition of that the badge means/entails. In the case of the various software licenses, or creative commons licenses, that is straightforward &#8212; what is being licensed is clear, as well as the terms of the license.</p>
<p>What is being distributed in open science? Is it just the text describing a particular piece of work? If that is the case, don&#8217;t the creative commons licenses/badges apply?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Nielsen &#187; Biweekly links for 07/21/2008</title>
		<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html#comment-1940</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Nielsen &#187; Biweekly links for 07/21/2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html#comment-1940</guid>
		<description>[...] Greg Wilson: &#8220;This research is certified open&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Greg Wilson: &#8220;This research is certified open&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Wilson</title>
		<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html#comment-1939</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html#comment-1939</guid>
		<description>@Deepak: the Open Source Initiative is a pretty broad church, yet does a widely-accepted job of distinguishing between what *is* FLOSS and what isn&#039;t; I think we could borrow a lot from them.

@Paddy: +1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Deepak: the Open Source Initiative is a pretty broad church, yet does a widely-accepted job of distinguishing between what *is* FLOSS and what isn&#8217;t; I think we could borrow a lot from them.</p>
<p>@Paddy: +1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddy3118</title>
		<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html#comment-1938</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy3118</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/archives/1677.html#comment-1938</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s hoping it has a knock-on effect of making what is written less intelligible gibberish and more approachable.

- Paddy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s hoping it has a knock-on effect of making what is written less intelligible gibberish and more approachable.</p>
<p>- Paddy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

