<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Without the Hot Air</title>
	<atom:link href="http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/2432.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/2432.html</link>
	<description>Data is ones and zeroes &#124; Software is ones and zeroes and hard work.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:23:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Simmons</title>
		<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/2432.html#comment-2672</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 23:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/?p=2432#comment-2672</guid>
		<description>SEWHA is also available as a PDF free to download from David Mackay&#039;s web site, http://www.withouthotair.com.

For those interested in Information Theory, David Mackay has also written Information Theory, Inference &amp; Learning Algorithms. The style is similar - clear, accessible and rigorous. It&#039;s also available as a free PDF. Although it took me all of two minutes to order the dead tree version from Amazon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEWHA is also available as a PDF free to download from David Mackay&#8217;s web site, <a href="http://www.withouthotair.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.withouthotair.com</a>.</p>
<p>For those interested in Information Theory, David Mackay has also written Information Theory, Inference &amp; Learning Algorithms. The style is similar &#8211; clear, accessible and rigorous. It&#8217;s also available as a free PDF. Although it took me all of two minutes to order the dead tree version from Amazon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/2432.html#comment-2671</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/?p=2432#comment-2671</guid>
		<description>Thank you for pointing to this book, it looks very interesting and I hadn&#039;t heard about it. http://www.withouthotair.com/ and http://www.withouthotair.com/download.html look to be useful links too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for pointing to this book, it looks very interesting and I hadn&#8217;t heard about it. <a href="http://www.withouthotair.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.withouthotair.com/</a> and <a href="http://www.withouthotair.com/download.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.withouthotair.com/download.html</a> look to be useful links too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guillaume Theoret</title>
		<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/2432.html#comment-2670</link>
		<dc:creator>Guillaume Theoret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/?p=2432#comment-2670</guid>
		<description>I would guess that these &quot;back of the envelope&quot; do happen in software, but rarely in software engineering.

This is entirely opinion of course but I have a feeling that if someone could study how people go about feasability analysis in regular commercial software, big company internal software, defense and mission/life critial software and startups that are either bootstrapped or have little cash, you&#039;d find some very interesting ways people do these sanity checks.

My hypothesis would be that the bootstrapped startups do these checks a lot more than anyone else, followed by mission/life critical with a precipitous drop everywhere else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would guess that these &#8220;back of the envelope&#8221; do happen in software, but rarely in software engineering.</p>
<p>This is entirely opinion of course but I have a feeling that if someone could study how people go about feasability analysis in regular commercial software, big company internal software, defense and mission/life critial software and startups that are either bootstrapped or have little cash, you&#8217;d find some very interesting ways people do these sanity checks.</p>
<p>My hypothesis would be that the bootstrapped startups do these checks a lot more than anyone else, followed by mission/life critical with a precipitous drop everywhere else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

