<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vote!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/3426.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/3426.html</link>
	<description>Data is ones and zeroes &#124; Software is ones and zeroes and hard work.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/3426.html#comment-3375</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 23:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/?p=3426#comment-3375</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s official:

http://www.chipchick.com/2010/02/computer-engineer-barbie.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s official:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chipchick.com/2010/02/computer-engineer-barbie.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.chipchick.com/2010/02/computer-engineer-barbie.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What do you think of diversity? &#171; Tania Samsonova&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/3426.html#comment-3374</link>
		<dc:creator>What do you think of diversity? &#171; Tania Samsonova&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/?p=3426#comment-3374</guid>
		<description>[...] 2010 &#183; Leave a Comment  This post started as my comment to Greg Wilson&#8217;s blog. Greg posted a link to O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s call for diversity. I think that the very concept of increasing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2010 &middot; Leave a Comment  This post started as my comment to Greg Wilson&#8217;s blog. Greg posted a link to O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s call for diversity. I think that the very concept of increasing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tania</title>
		<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/3426.html#comment-3373</link>
		<dc:creator>Tania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 06:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/?p=3426#comment-3373</guid>
		<description>Greg, as a woman who&#039;s been in IT for about 20 years I must say that the &quot;improving diversity&quot; thing looks like BS to me and insults the very people whom it is supposed to help. Please correct me if I am wrong.

Here&#039;s my train of reasoning. Either someone deserves to be a speaker at a conference (by the pure merit of their research and speaking skills), or they don&#039;t. If they do, then invite them because they are worth it, not because they are minorities. On the other hand, if they don&#039;t deserve it but still get invited, this implies the poor things can&#039;t do better anyway, so let&#039;s condescend to them.

Moreover, if e.g. a woman got to be a speaker, there will always be suspicion that she got in by being a minority and not because of her actual achievements. All in all, it seems to me that this policy does more harm than good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, as a woman who&#8217;s been in IT for about 20 years I must say that the &#8220;improving diversity&#8221; thing looks like BS to me and insults the very people whom it is supposed to help. Please correct me if I am wrong.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my train of reasoning. Either someone deserves to be a speaker at a conference (by the pure merit of their research and speaking skills), or they don&#8217;t. If they do, then invite them because they are worth it, not because they are minorities. On the other hand, if they don&#8217;t deserve it but still get invited, this implies the poor things can&#8217;t do better anyway, so let&#8217;s condescend to them.</p>
<p>Moreover, if e.g. a woman got to be a speaker, there will always be suspicion that she got in by being a minority and not because of her actual achievements. All in all, it seems to me that this policy does more harm than good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

