<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube for Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/740.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/740.html</link>
	<description>Data is ones and zeroes &#124; Software is ones and zeroes and hard work.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Wilson</title>
		<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/740.html#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 14:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/archives/740.html#comment-757</guid>
		<description>Wow, that was quick turnaround ;-)  I&#039;m very interested in Swivel
because I teach an open source course on basic software engineering
skills for scientists and engineers (http://swc.scipy.org); having
high-quality data sets available to mess with will make life a lot
easier, and provide &quot;good practice&quot; examples for grad students.  My
concern is quality control: what are you planning to put in place
to give people an idea of how trustworthy data is?  Or is your model
to become &quot;Wikipedia for data&quot;? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that was quick turnaround <img src='http://third-bit.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />   I&#8217;m very interested in Swivel<br />
because I teach an open source course on basic software engineering<br />
skills for scientists and engineers (<a href="http://swc.scipy.org" rel="nofollow">http://swc.scipy.org</a>); having<br />
high-quality data sets available to mess with will make life a lot<br />
easier, and provide &#8220;good practice&#8221; examples for grad students.  My<br />
concern is quality control: what are you planning to put in place<br />
to give people an idea of how trustworthy data is?  Or is your model<br />
to become &#8220;Wikipedia for data&#8221;? <img src='http://third-bit.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Mulloy</title>
		<link>http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/740.html#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Mulloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 14:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pyre.third-bit.com/blog/archives/740.html#comment-756</guid>
		<description>A lot of folks started saying YouTube for data, but Dmitry and I both chuckle because it wasn&#039;t us. We are going to focus on making data something you can have fun clicking around in, instead of something you need a manual to operate.  Dmitry and I both studied physics and on the one hand we agree with you, Swivel will probably not be for science: the competition is pretty fierce with Mathematica (a very inspirational piece of software) on the one hand and  GNUPlot on the other.  However, we hope that the same honest, open peer review process that drives good science in academia will also drive balanced and fair data verification and validation at Swivel.   The cool thing about a Web site  versus a piece of software like GNUPlot is that a Web site is half communication vehicle.  So, we hope that the validation and verification actually accelerates at Swivel.  Please swing on by once we open up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of folks started saying YouTube for data, but Dmitry and I both chuckle because it wasn&#8217;t us. We are going to focus on making data something you can have fun clicking around in, instead of something you need a manual to operate.  Dmitry and I both studied physics and on the one hand we agree with you, Swivel will probably not be for science: the competition is pretty fierce with Mathematica (a very inspirational piece of software) on the one hand and  GNUPlot on the other.  However, we hope that the same honest, open peer review process that drives good science in academia will also drive balanced and fair data verification and validation at Swivel.   The cool thing about a Web site  versus a piece of software like GNUPlot is that a Web site is half communication vehicle.  So, we hope that the validation and verification actually accelerates at Swivel.  Please swing on by once we open up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

