Feedback at UKMO

I've just finished teaching a four-day version of the course at the UK Met Office in Exeter. I think it went reasonably well, even if we did version control last instead of first :-). Here's the feedback the students gave me:

Good

  • Most of what the instructor told us was probably true!
  • Liked the emphasis on the human aspects of software development
  • Liked the emphasis on evidence-based software engineering
  • Lots of details on how to do testing
  • Liked it when the instructor went off on tangents
  • Liked having pointers to more material
  • Instructor enthusiastic
  • Lots of stuff on course web site
  • Enjoyed learning a new language
  • Finally had someone explain why to make code readable
  • Nice mix of concepts and details
  • Modular course design allowed me to catch up when I got lost

Bad

  • No overall roadmap or guide
  • Some (many?) parts too fast
  • Didn't have access to the code the instructor was writing "live"
  • Instructor went off on too many tangents
  • The links the instructor mentioned aren't collected anywhere
  • There weren't any tea breaks on the first two days (tiring)
  • Need citations for claims that "studies show"
  • Some people left behind in some parts
  • Squeezing it into a week made some parts indigestible
  • Had to learn a new language
  • Don't know where to go next with Python
  • The first two days felt rushed
  • Some of the examples could have been better fits for this audience

In the wake of posts about Shopify's support for white nationalists and DataCamp's attempts to cover up sexual harassment
I have had to disable comments on this blog. Please email me if you'd like to get in touch.